Page 165 - Raw Diet References Book 2019
P. 165

36


                         MAINTENANCE ENERGY REQUIREMENTS DETERMINATION

                         Determination of maintenance energy requirements, together with assessment of food en-
                         ergy content, is the keystone of rationing.
                           On surveying the rich literature about dog nutrition, it can be noted that relatively few
                         works have been published about this very important topic, in comparison with those on
                         mineral, vitamin and protein requirements.
                           Nutritional parameters proposed, such as McCay’s (1943) parameters, are not reliable
                         when applied to each canine breed. NRC (1985) suggested two equations that are still widely
                         used but have been recently questioned by several authors. This topic has a wide practical
                         interest, so, we have collected the most authoritative works published in the international
                         literature, in order to verify possible differences and to understand the reasons for these
                         differences.
                           In Table I, equations proposed by different authors are reported; and results of some
                         equationsappliedtodifferentbodyweightclassesareshowninGraphI.Differencesbetween
                         maximum and minimum values are as high as 100%, obviously a very high percentage that
                         can thwart rationing efficacy.
                           Why are these differences so large?
                           In the dog, there are several relevant variables influencing maintenance requirements.
                         Evaluation of these is essential for the correct assessment of requirements.
                           The main variables to consider are as follows:


                         TABLE I
                         Metabolizable energy (kcal) requirements equations in dogs and indications of application

                         Author                  Proposed equation  Indications

                         Patil and Bisby (2001)  94 × P 0,75     Not active, old, neutered,
                                                                   quiet and sedentary dogs
                         Burger (1994)           97 × P 0,75
                         Manner (1991) ∗         103 × P 0,75
                         Finke (1991)            103 × P 0,75
                         German Society of Nutritional  108 × P 0,75
                          Physiology (1989)
                         Finke (1991)            117 × P 0,75    Normal dogs, dogs living in kennels or
                                                                   in group, young dogs
                         NRC (1974)              132 × P 0,75
                         Kendall et al. (1983)   148 × P 0,75    Very active dogs, young and active dogs
                         Burger (1994)           175 × P 0,75
                         Patil and Bisby (2001)  183 × P 0,75    Nervous and hyperactive dogs, Great Danes
                                                                   living outdoor, Terriers
                         Zentek and Meyer (1992)  200 × P 0,75


                         Data obtained in metabolic room.
                         ∗
   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170