Page 26 - Appetite_Stimulation_In_Dogs_Complete
P. 26

1854                                        Zollers et al














































            Fig 1. Case flow indicating how the safety (ITT) and PP populations were identified for the capromorelin and placebo treatment groups.
            *Some dogs were excluded for more than one reason.


            Table 1. Population demographics at screening of the  56.2% (95% CI, 47.2, 64.8) of the capromorelin-treated
            intention to treat population.                    dogs were defined as success, compared to 26.8% (95%
                                                              CI, 16.8, 39.9) of the placebo-treated dogs (P = .007).
            Characteristic           Capromorelin  Placebo
                                                              Analyzing the scores of the subpopulation of dogs with
            Age (years)  N            171          73         the worst appetites (Owner Appetite Scores of <13 on
                        Mean (SD)     8.0 (4.4)   8.1 (4.4)   day 0; n = 100 capromorelin-treated dogs and n = 48
                        Min, Max      0.3, 16.4   0.9, 18.0   placebo-treated dogs), capromorelin-treated dogs also
            Sex         Female intact   7 (4.1%)   5 (6.8%)   showed greater success (an improvement of 5 or more
                        Female spayed  83 (48.5%)  26 (35.6%)
                        Male intact    17 (9.9%)   9 (12.3%)  points) than placebo-treated dogs, with 64.0% (95%
                        Male neutered  64 (37.4%)  32 (43.8%)  CI, 54.1, 72.9) compared to 27.1% (95% CI, 16.4,
            Weight (kg)  Mean (SD)    17.1 (1.1)  16.3 (1.5)  41.4), respectively (P = .002).
                        Min, Max      1.7, 76.5   1.5, 52.2     Body Weight. Mean body weights in the capromore-
                                                              lin and placebo groups were not different at baseline
                                                              (P = .794). Over the 4 days of treatment, both capro-
              At day 0, no difference in the mean scores of the  morelin- and placebo-treated dogs gained weight, with
            Owner  Appetite  Assessment  were  found between  capromorelin treatment associated with a mean percent-
            groups. (See Supplemental Information for the distribu-  age change significantly greater (P < .001) than placebo
            tion of total scores in each group at day 0 and day  treatment (1.8% with SD   2.8, CI, 1.3, 2.3 and 0.1%
            3   1.) The mean percent change from day 0 to day  with SD   3.6, CI, 0.9, 1.1, respectively). Additionally,
            3   1 was 73.3% (SD   75.9; 95% CI, 59.6, 87.0) in  a statistically significantly larger proportion of capro-
            the capromorelin treatment group compared to 37.6%  morelin-treated dogs experienced a change in weight of
            (SD   53.9; 95% CI, 23.1, 52.0) in the placebo group  >0% as compared to placebo-treated dogs with 76.0%
            (P = .013). Defining success as an increase of 5 or more  (95% CI, 67.6, 82.8) and 44.6% (95% CI, 32.2, 57.8)
            from baseline in the Owner Appetite Assessment,   showing weight gain, respectively (P = .001).
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29